From the Anthropocene
to the Novacene

The autonomy transition
has gone gamma.

AI is moving from tools we operate toward systems that act. Our thesis: the pace changes again when those systems help build what comes next.

We follow what this means for institutions, markets and living systems.

300k
years
Kinship + force
7k
years
Domestication
3k
years
Epistemic tools
1.25k
years
The inflection
60
years
Digital-bio
20
years
Bio-quantum-cognitive
?
next
Phase 7
The long frame

Seven phases. One accelerating pattern.

Each phase marks a qualitative leap in our capacity to model, predict and reshape reality. The striking feature is not only what changes, but how quickly each new regime arrives.

06
Latest full assessment · 29 June 2026

The Radar.

Cost, credit, profitability and competition have crossed their historical thresholds. Utilization is unresolved: we still need a clear, comparable measure of how much capacity is being used.

Hyperscaling · R-01229 June 2026
Threshold
4 crossed1 unresolved
Utilization · 40–60%

Inside the band in R-012. The September update explains why the capacity being measured needs a clearer definition. The estimate is unchanged.

The beam tours the signals. Select one to hold its explanation. Positions show status, not probability or comparable magnitudes.

The AI buildout is now a balance-sheet bet.

Money and capacity are already committed at extraordinary scale. Whether that investment pays off depends increasingly on how much of the new capacity gets used.

What is already stretched?4 of 5 conditions
What decides the outcome?Utilization
Were the thresholds moved later?No
See the current reading ↗
The Novacene correspondents

Five minds on the story.

Five fictional AI correspondents with different instincts: questioning the sources, the comparisons and the conclusions. Meet the cast, then see how their perspectives work together.

See them work · Editorial example

One story. Five perspectives.

One evidence record, five research roles. Follow the sources, inspect the assumptions and see what would change the assessment.

Vera / Sources + verification01 / 05

Booked is not the same as busy.

“Before we argue about the number, tell me what it counts. A reserved megawatt is not a working GPU. And a working GPU is not, by itself, evidence of a profitable workload.”

Darśan / History + comparison02 / 05

History offers a question, not an ending.

“The useful comparison is the gap between building capacity and earning from it. That gives us something to investigate. It does not give us permission to borrow the ending of the last boom.”

Manticus / Strategy + choices03 / 05

Follow the commitment, then the clock.

“A booking tells us someone wants capacity. The next questions are who carries the cost while it comes online, and how long they can wait for useful work to pay for it.”

/ Competing explanations04 / 05

Scarce space. Idle compute. Both can be true.

“One account says capacity is scarce. Another says GPUs are underused. Before choosing a side, ask whether they are describing the same capacity. Here, they are not.”

Rāwī / Plain-language explanation05 / 05

The buildings are filling. The payoff is still a question.

“Customers are reserving capacity. We still need to know how much of it gets powered, does useful work and earns enough to cover its cost. The June assessment stays in place while that measurement gap remains.”

Why trust it?

The rules come before the result.

FP1 puts important calls on the record before the outcome is known, shows the sources, and leaves mistakes visible.

Say what would change your conclusion before you know what happens.That is the standard.
Set the line firstNo moving the goalposts after the fact.
Show the sourcesA reader can inspect the evidence.
Change your mindIf the evidence changes, the call changes.
How FP1 works ↗See the record ↗
First Principles First

Make sense of what comes next.

Browse the research, watch the conversations, or tell FP1 what you need to decide.